Mission & Values

O U R M I S S I O N

To develop and advance a best-in-class system of postsecondary education in prisons across the Commonwealth

Our Values


We believe that education has intrinsic value for all people, in all places, at all times. 

We believe in higher education as a unique catalyst for personal, societal, and economic transformation. 

We believe in opportunity and multiple chances for change, growth, and achievement. 

We believe in eliminating the barriers of stigma, established practice, and underestimation faced by system-impacted individuals working to improve their lives. 

We believe in consensus and collaboration as fundamental civic tools for optimizing solutions. 

We believe in evidence-based standards of principle and best practice. 

Person-Centered Language

Adapted from: Alliance for Higher Education in Prison

Person-centered language is crucial when referring to individuals affected by the justice system and those incarcerated. It conveys respect for their dignity, humanity, and individuality. It emphasizes the person before their circumstances, avoids dehumanizing labels, and fosters more empathetic and respectful dialogue.

When discussing higher education in prison settings, we refer to college students or learners—acknowledging individuals’ defining role in this context.

Importance of Person-Centered Language 

Respect and Dignity

It underscores the importance of viewing individuals as more than their mistakes or legal status, reinforcing their worth and humanity. 

Encouraging Positive Change

By using respectful language, we foster an environment that supports personal growth and the possibility of change, rather than focusing solely on past actions. 

Reducing Stigma

Person-centered language helps combat harmful stereotypes and biases that can perpetuate discrimination and limit opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration. 

Empathy and Understanding 

This language promotes a more nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by justice-impacted individuals, which can lead to more compassionate and effective support systems. 

Examples of Person-Centered Language vs. Non-Person-Centered Language 

PERSON CENTERED

“Individuals with a criminal record” or “justice-impacted individuals”

“Formerly incarcerated individuals” or “people currently in incarceration”

“Individuals with a history of repeated legal issues” or “people who have experienced multiple incarcerations”

“Young people involved in the justice system”

“Individuals with felony convictions” or “people who have faced legal challenges”

NON-PERSON CENTERED

“Criminals” or “offenders”

“Ex-convicts” or “inmates”

“Repeated offenders” or “career criminals”

“Juvenile delinquents”

“Felon” or “lawbreakers”

Using person-centered language acknowledges that everyone has a multifaceted identity beyond their legal situation. It promotes a more humane and constructive discourse, supporting efforts to address systemic issues and foster rehabilitation and reintegration.